1975 Alpine A 310 vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Alpine A 310. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Alpine A 310 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1975 Alpine A 310. (127 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1975 Alpine A 310.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Alpine A 310. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Alpine A 310. (146 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Alpine A 310.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Alpine A 310 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Alpine | Jeep |
| Model | A 310 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1604 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 191 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 87 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |
