1975 AMC Pacer vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1975 AMC Pacer is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 833 kg more than 1975 AMC Pacer.
Because 1960 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 AMC Pacer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 AMC Pacer | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | AMC | Cadillac |
| Model | Pacer | 62 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 2195 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |
