1975 AMC Pacer vs. 1962 Reliant Sabre 4
To start off, 1975 AMC Pacer is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Reliant Sabre 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Reliant Sabre 4 would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 AMC Pacer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 AMC Pacer weights approximately 565 kg more than 1962 Reliant Sabre 4.
Because 1962 Reliant Sabre 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Reliant Sabre 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 AMC Pacer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 AMC Pacer | 1962 Reliant Sabre 4 | |
Make | AMC | Reliant |
Model | Pacer | Sabre 4 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4228 cc | 1702 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 797 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2290 mm |