1975 AMC Pacer vs. 2001 Cadillac XLR

To start off, 2001 Cadillac XLR is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 AMC Pacer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 AMC Pacer would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 292 kg more than 1975 AMC Pacer.

Because 2001 Cadillac XLR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Cadillac XLR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 AMC Pacer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1975 AMC Pacer 2001 Cadillac XLR
Make AMC Cadillac
Model Pacer XLR
Year Released 1975 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4228 cc 4565 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 0 HP 316 HP
Engine Bore Size 95.3 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99.1 mm 84 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1362 kg 1654 kg
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2690 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]