1975 AMC Pacer vs. 2009 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac STS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 AMC Pacer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 AMC Pacer would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 AMC Pacer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac STS weights approximately 273 kg more than 1975 AMC Pacer.
Because 2009 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 AMC Pacer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 AMC Pacer | 2009 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | AMC | Cadillac |
| Model | Pacer | STS |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4228 cc | 3599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1635 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2960 mm |
