1975 Aston Martin AM Vantage vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Aston Martin AM Vantage. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Aston Martin AM Vantage would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Aston Martin AM Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Aston Martin AM Vantage (321 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (251 HP @ 7150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Aston Martin AM Vantage should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Aston Martin AM Vantage weights approximately 340 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Aston Martin AM Vantage | 2006 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
| Model | AM Vantage | Clio |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1410 kg |
