1975 Audi 100 vs. 2006 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 100 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1975 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi 100.
Because 2006 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 460 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 100 | 2006 Cadillac STS-V | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 100 | STS-V |
Year Released | 1975 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 4376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 440 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 584 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 64 L |