1975 Audi 50 vs. 1960 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1975 Audi 50 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,091 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Audi 50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Audi 50 (49 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. (43 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Audi 50 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 240 kg more than 1975 Audi 50.
Because 1960 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Audi 50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Nissan Bluebird (84 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Audi 50. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1960 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Audi 50.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 50 | 1960 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 50 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1975 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 77 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1500 mm |