1975 Audi 50 vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1975 Audi 50 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1975 Audi 50. (49 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 455 kg more than 1975 Audi 50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 50 | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Audi | Sunbeam |
Model | 50 | Tiger |
Year Released | 1975 | 1966 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1570 mm |