1975 Audi 50 vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1976 Toyota Celica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Toyota Celica weights approximately 265 kg more than 1975 Audi 50.
Because 1976 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 50 | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 50 | Celica |
Year Released | 1975 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1640 mm |