1975 Audi 50 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,115 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1975 Audi 50. (49 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1975 Audi 50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 102 (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Audi 50. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Audi 50.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 50 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | 50 | 102 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 77 Nm | 78 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |