1975 Audi 50 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 411 more horse power than 1975 Audi 50. (49 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi 50.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Audi 50. (77 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Audi 50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Audi 50 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 50 | ST 460 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1091 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 460 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 77 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1830 mm |
