1975 Audi 50 vs. 2002 Daewoo Lanos
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,348 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Lanos (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1975 Audi 50. (49 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 325 kg more than 1975 Audi 50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Lanos (115 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Audi 50. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Lanos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Audi 50.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 50 | 2002 Daewoo Lanos | |
Make | Audi | Daewoo |
Model | 50 | Lanos |
Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 1348 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 77 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1690 mm |