1975 Audi 50 vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Audi 50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1975 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1975 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Audi 50 | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Audi | Volvo |
| Model | 50 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2519 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1900 mm |
