1975 Audi 50 vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Audi 50 | 2003 MG ZT | |
| Make | Audi | MG |
| Model | 50 | ZT |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1951 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1790 mm |
