1975 Audi 50 vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (158 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1975 Audi 50. (49 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 800 kg more than 1975 Audi 50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Audi 50. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Audi 50.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 50 | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Audi | MG |
Model | 50 | ZT |
Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 77 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1790 mm |