1975 Audi 50 vs. 2004 Caterham 7
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Audi 50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 50 | 2004 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Audi | Caterham |
Model | 50 | 7 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1997 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1580 mm |