1975 Audi 50 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1975 Audi 50. (49 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi 50.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Audi 50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Audi 50. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Audi 50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Audi 50 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 50 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1091 cc | 2972 cc |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 77 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1780 mm |
