1975 Audi 50 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1975 Audi 50. (49 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi 50.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Audi 50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Audi 50. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Audi 50.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 50 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 50 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1975 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1091 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 77 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1780 mm |