1975 Audi 50 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 50 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 1975 Audi 50 has manual transmission. 1975 Audi 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 50 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Audi | Kia |
Model | 50 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3300 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 294 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 4-speed manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1850 mm |