1975 Audi 80 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1975 Audi 80. (75 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi 80.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Audi 80. (112 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 80 | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 80 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2210 mm |