1975 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 132 more horse power than 1975 Audi 80. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi 80.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Audi 80. (140 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Audi 80 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 80 | UTE |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |