1975 Audi Coupe vs. 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Audi Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Audi Coupe would be higher. At 2,427 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager (150 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1975 Audi Coupe. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1975 Audi Coupe.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager (210 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Audi Coupe. (176 Nm). This means 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Audi Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Audi Coupe | 2002 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
| Make | Audi | Chrysler |
| Model | Coupe | Grand Voyager |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2427 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 101 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2960 mm |
