1975 Austin 1800 vs. 1959 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1975 Austin 1800 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ford Fairlane (168 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1975 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1975 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 904 kg more than 1975 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Austin 1800 | 1959 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | 1800 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 5769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 2094 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3000 mm |
