1975 Austin 1800 vs. 1970 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1975 Austin 1800 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Cadillac Sixty (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1975 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1975 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1006 kg more than 1975 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin 1800 | 1970 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | 1800 | Sixty |
Year Released | 1975 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 2196 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3390 mm |