1975 Austin 1800 vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1990 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Renault Clio (91 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1975 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1975 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Austin 1800 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Renault Clio (141 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin 1800 | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | 1800 | Clio |
Year Released | 1975 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 83.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |