1975 Austin 1800 vs. 1996 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 1996 Marcos Mantis is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Marcos Mantis (352 HP) has 266 more horse power than 1975 Austin 1800. (86 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1975 Austin 1800.
Because 1996 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Marcos Mantis (407 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Austin 1800. (140 Nm). This means 1996 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Austin 1800 | 1996 Marcos Mantis | |
| Make | Austin | Marcos |
| Model | 1800 | Mantis |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 352 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2290 mm |
