1975 Austin 1800 vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Austin 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1975 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1975 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 18 kg more than 1975 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford e-Ka (190 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Austin 1800. (140 Nm). This means 2000 Ford e-Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Austin 1800 | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | 1800 | e-Ka |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1758 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2730 mm |
