1975 Austin 1800 vs. 2000 Toyota Caserta
To start off, 2000 Toyota Caserta is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,995 cc, 2000 Toyota Caserta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Austin 1800 (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Austin 1800 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Caserta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Austin 1800 weights approximately 254 kg more than 2000 Toyota Caserta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Caserta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Caserta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 140 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin 1800 | 2000 Toyota Caserta | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 1800 | Caserta |
Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 140 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 936 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 55 L |