1975 Austin 1800 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1975 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1975 Austin 1800.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin 1800 | 2006 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | 1800 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1975 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 61 L |