1975 Austin 1800 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1975 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1975 Austin 1800.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin 1800 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 1800 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1975 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 50 L |