1975 Austin 1800 vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1975 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1975 Austin 1800.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Austin 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin 1800 | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | 1800 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |