1975 Austin 1800 vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1975 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1975 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 345 kg more than 1975 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Austin 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (226 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Austin 1800. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Austin 1800 | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 1800 | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1799 cc | 2360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 166 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4665 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2670 mm |
