1975 Austin Allegro vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Allegro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 370 kg more than 1975 Austin Allegro.
Because 2013 Mini Cooper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mini Cooper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Cooper (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Austin Allegro. (74 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Austin Allegro.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Allegro | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Austin | Mini |
Model | Allegro | Cooper |
Year Released | 1975 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 50 L |