1975 Austin Maxi vs. 1948 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1975 Austin Maxi is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Austin Maxi (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Austin Maxi should accelerate faster than 1948 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 130 kg more than 1975 Austin Maxi.
Because 1948 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1948 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1948 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Austin Maxi. (104 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 1948 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Maxi | 1948 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Maxi | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1975 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1483 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2040 mm |