1975 Austin Maxi vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,483 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo weights approximately 190 kg more than 1975 Austin Maxi.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo has automatic transmission and 1975 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1975 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Maxi | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Maxi | Dingo |
Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1483 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2450 mm |