1975 Austin Princess vs. 1950 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1975 Austin Princess is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 592 kg more than 1975 Austin Princess.
Because 1950 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Princess | 1950 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Princess | 62 |
Year Released | 1975 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3210 mm |