1975 Austin Princess vs. 1952 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1975 Austin Princess is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Princess | 1952 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | 12 M |
Year Released | 1975 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2500 mm |