1975 Austin Princess vs. 1954 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1975 Austin Princess is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Austin Princess weights approximately 410 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G.
Because 1954 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Austin Princess | 1954 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Austin | Maserati |
| Model | Princess | A6G |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1698 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2320 mm |
