1975 Austin Princess vs. 1968 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 1975 Austin Princess is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 510 kg more than 1975 Austin Princess.
Because 1968 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Princess | 1968 Chevrolet Caprice | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Princess | Caprice |
Year Released | 1975 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 6476 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3030 mm |