1975 Austin Princess vs. 1970 Jaguar E-Type
To start off, 1975 Austin Princess is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 160 kg more than 1975 Austin Princess.
Because 1970 Jaguar E-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Jaguar E-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Austin Princess | 1970 Jaguar E-Type | |
| Make | Austin | Jaguar |
| Model | Princess | E-Type |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1698 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 246 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2440 mm |
