1975 Austin Princess vs. 1980 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1980 Zastava 1300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,698 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Austin Princess weights approximately 200 kg more than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Because 1980 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Austin Princess | 1980 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | Princess | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1698 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2430 mm |
