1975 Austin Princess vs. 1981 Chrysler Avenger
To start off, 1981 Chrysler Avenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,223 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Austin Princess weights approximately 365 kg more than 1981 Chrysler Avenger.
Because 1981 Chrysler Avenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chrysler Avenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Princess | 1981 Chrysler Avenger | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Princess | Avenger |
Year Released | 1975 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2223 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2500 mm |