1975 Austin Princess vs. 1995 Rover MGF
To start off, 1995 Rover MGF is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover MGF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover MGF weights approximately 364 kg more than 1975 Austin Princess.
Because 1995 Rover MGF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Rover MGF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Princess | 1995 Rover MGF | |
Make | Austin | Rover |
Model | Princess | MGF |
Year Released | 1975 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1280 mm |