1975 Austin Princess vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1355 kg more than 1975 Austin Princess.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1975 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1975 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Princess | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Austin | Land Rover |
Model | Princess | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2890 mm |