1975 Austin Princess vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 90 kg more than 1975 Austin Princess.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Princess | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Princess | Colt |
Year Released | 1975 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 2834 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2970 mm |