1975 Austin Princess vs. 2009 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Princess would be higher. At 6,690 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Ram weights approximately 202 kg more than 1975 Austin Princess.
Because 2009 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Princess | 2009 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Princess | Ram |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3580 mm |