1975 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1396 kg more than 1975 Austin Princess.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe has automatic transmission and 1975 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1975 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Princess | 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Princess | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 320 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2556 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1953 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2946 mm |