1975 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Princess would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Ram weights approximately 531 kg more than 1975 Austin Princess.
Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Dodge Ram has automatic transmission and 1975 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1975 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Ram will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Princess | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Princess | Ram |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1698 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 345 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 4080 mm |