1975 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Austin Princess would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Austin Princess | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Ranger |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3193 mm |